Law in Civil Engineering Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Law in Civil Engineering - Essay ExampleIn the UK, there be several laws en motivateed to protect women against this kind of unlikeness. Though the laws in like manner protect men from being discriminated against, women argon the victims in most cases. Several cases have set precedence of the actions and compensation that victims are entitled to in such(prenominal) cases. The case In the UK, the equality act enacted in 2010 protects employees against whatsoever form of sexual inconsistency. The equality act is just an extension of the sex discrimination act of 1975. It does not apply only to women but also covers men. The aspects of practice such as recruitment, appraisal and promotion are covered under this law. The terms of an employment issue should provide similar entitlements to both men and women since the nature of their work is homogenous and of the similar value. In drafting its employment contracts, the association should consult its legal experts who will advise it on the implications of each of the contract statements. Eileen could sue the company for gender discrimination, age discrimination, criminal intimidation and unfair dismissal. She is entitled to damages should she come through the case or decide to settle. On the first count of gender discrimination, Eileen is likely to be victorious if the case goes to court. Her managers comments that the company has an unwritten insurance for women in their twenties to be promoted are sexist. He says that the reason for this is that they leave to have children. An example would be a case in which a male supervisor at the Deutsche Bank made jokes considered sexist in the office about women. An employee Dr. Swinburne sued the hope for sex discrimination and was awarded compensation of ?40000 (Labour research department, 1988). Another example of such a case was the upper side Prosecution Services vs Maria Bimieh in February 2000. She won a case for sex and racial discrimination case against th e family. Her male supervisor failed to promote her even after her performance reviews showed that she met the requirements for a promotion. She had worked at the firm for 12 years. The company is vulnerable if it does not have any written document on its policy on sex discrimination. If Eileen and other employees bear witness that in her time working for the company, the management did not hold any educational forums to educate its employees on the implications of sex discrimination or have semiofficial policies on according each person equal opportunities on promotion and other matters, then the company is liable for the damages. In 2003, a trainee sales representative at a car showroom be to beadles group sued for discrimination claiming compensation of ?180000 which she won. The reason for her compensation was that she was forced to quit work by the worthless conduct of a colleague at work. The court ruled that since the company did not make any efforts to deter this behavio r from its employees, it was liable for her emotional injuries. The medical evidence presented during the case showed that it would be more than 2 years before she was emotionally fit to work again. Sex discrimination cases do not ever so go in the directions of the plaintiffs, some have also lost. In Villalba vs Lynch inn 2004, the tribunal shew that she had no basis for a sexual discrimination claim in which she was asking for ? 1.7m in settlement. She claimed discrimination for being made to perform the duties of cabin crew as the directors of